Taoism of China & Zen philosophy of Japan

The post Taoism of China & Zen philosophy of Japan appeared first on  KanglaOnline.com.By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh In the West including America, more and more people are turning to mysticism or spiritualism. Among these, there is a revival of…

The post Taoism of China & Zen philosophy of Japan appeared first on  KanglaOnline.com.

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh In the West including America, more and more people are turning to mysticism or spiritualism. Among these, there is a revival of interest in Taoism and Zen philosophy. Mysticism is a belief characterised by self-delusion … Continue reading

The post Taoism of China & Zen philosophy of Japan appeared first on  KanglaOnline.com.

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/09/taoism-of-china-zen-philosophy-of-japan/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=taoism-of-china-zen-philosophy-of-japan

Islam – The Fastest Growing Religion

The post Islam – The Fastest Growing Religion appeared first on  KanglaOnline.com.By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh Islam is the fastest growing religion on earth. One in four persons in the world is a Muslim. From Morocco to Indonesia; from central…

The post Islam – The Fastest Growing Religion appeared first on  KanglaOnline.com.

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh Islam is the fastest growing religion on earth. One in four persons in the world is a Muslim. From Morocco to Indonesia; from central Asia to Pakistan, India and Burma, one finds large Muslim populations. … Continue reading

The post Islam – The Fastest Growing Religion appeared first on  KanglaOnline.com.

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/08/islam-the-fastest-growing-religion/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=islam-the-fastest-growing-religion

Buddhism

The post Buddhism appeared first on  KanglaOnline.com.Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh          January 15 2012  The basic concept of the union of the Soul with God is the fundamental tenet of all religions though it has no meaning in Buddhism. Buddhi…

The post Buddhism appeared first on  KanglaOnline.com.

Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh          January 15 2012  The basic concept of the union of the Soul with God is the fundamental tenet of all religions though it has no meaning in Buddhism. Buddhist doctrines are concerned … Continue reading

The post Buddhism appeared first on  KanglaOnline.com.

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/07/buddhism/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=buddhism

Hinduism

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh In my aspiration to delve into the perception of divine mind I find no better religion than my own – Hinduism. I was born a… Read more »The post Hinduism appeared first on KanglaOnline.com.

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh In my aspiration to delve into the perception of divine mind I find no better religion than my own – Hinduism. I was born a… Read more »

The post Hinduism appeared first on KanglaOnline.com.

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/07/hinduism/

Further evidence that the Meiteis came from Africa

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh Posted: 2012-06-28 The peopling of India is a very contentious subject, no less then the theory of migration of the Meiteis to Manipur. While some… Read more »The post Further evidence that the Meiteis came from Afr…

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh Posted: 2012-06-28 The peopling of India is a very contentious subject, no less then the theory of migration of the Meiteis to Manipur. While some… Read more »

The post Further evidence that the Meiteis came from Africa appeared first on KanglaOnline.com.

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/06/further-evidence-meiteis-came-africa/

OBJECTIVE BURMA III INDIGENOUS BURMESE ORGIN & BURMESE LANGUAGE – MODERN PARADIGMS

Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh The proper name in Burmese for Ava is Ratnapura (Sanskrit) – the Cit of Gems, built in the 14th century CE that lasted for nearly 400… Read more »The post OBJECTIVE BURMA III INDIGENOUS BURMESE ORGIN & BURMESE…

Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh The proper name in Burmese for Ava is Ratnapura (Sanskrit) – the Cit of Gems, built in the 14th century CE that lasted for nearly 400… Read more »

The post OBJECTIVE BURMA III INDIGENOUS BURMESE ORGIN & BURMESE LANGUAGE – MODERN PARADIGMS appeared first on KanglaOnline.com.

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/06/objective-burma-iii-indigenous-burmese-orgin-burmese-language-modern-paradigms/

Bravery of Manipuri princes – OBJECTIVE BURMA II

OBJECTIVE BURMA  II CHAHI TARET KHUNDAKPA Bravery of Manipuri princes Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh       April 19 2012 * Note this feature is in continuation of Part I . Click the… Read more »

OBJECTIVE BURMA  II CHAHI TARET KHUNDAKPA Bravery of Manipuri princes Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh       April 19 2012 * Note this feature is in continuation of Part I . Click the… Read more »

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/06/bravery-of-manipuri-princes-objective-burma-ii/

Objective Burma – Part I Chahi Taret Khundakpa Of Manipur

The Burmese View of “Seven-year Devastation” of Manipur   By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh – April 19 2012 Though we can not always trust historians who often tend to manipulate, we can not do without them. For example: historians who study th…

The Burmese View of “Seven-year Devastation” of Manipur   By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh – April 19 2012 Though we can not always trust historians who often tend to manipulate, we can not do without them. For example: historians who study the life of Jesus draw a wide range of conclusions. While religious historians will […]

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/06/objective-burma-%E2%80%93-part-i-chahi-taret-khundakpa-of-manipur/

Objective Burma – Part I Chahi Taret Khundakpa Of Manipur

The Burmese View of “Seven-year Devastation” of Manipur   By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh – April 19 2012 Though we can not always trust historians who often tend to manipulate, we can not do without them. For example: historians who study th…

The Burmese View of “Seven-year Devastation” of Manipur   By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh – April 19 2012 Though we can not always trust historians who often tend to manipulate, we can not do without them. For example: historians who study the life of Jesus draw a wide range of conclusions. While religious historians will […]

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/06/objective-burma-%E2%80%93-part-i-chahi-taret-khundakpa-of-manipur/

How I became a freethinker – Discomfited by religious constraints

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh The theme redux of this article is the message that… more »

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh

The theme redux of this article is the message that all the people in Manipur should be united in the same mind and judgement regardless of different Gods or no Gods. This brings me to this topic of mine ie I am a freethinker who looks at every religion with an external perspective.

A freethinker is one who forms one’s own opinions rather than depends upon authority, especially about social and religious issues. ‘Freethinking’ is a term made popular during the Age of Enlightenment in the 18th Century England, by a philosopher, Anthony Collins in his book – Discourse of Freethinking in 1713.

Collins wrote: “Perfection of the sciences is only to be attained by free-thinking and the stories of the devil’s power were founded on lies of some and credulity of the others.”

In Germany, Frederic the Great became a great freethinker. Voltaire, Jean Jacques Rousseau and others made it popular in France while in America, Abraham Lincoln, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson made the impact.

Thomas Jefferson, the 4th American President (1809-1817) in his ‘Works’, wrote to his school boy nephew: “The God of the Old Testament – the God which Christians worship – a being of terrific character, cruel, vindictive, capricious and unjust” (Works Vol. IV, P 325).

In another letter he wrote to John Adams, a short time previous to his death: “The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus by the Supreme Being as his father, in the womb of a virgin will be classified with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter” (Works Vol. IV, P 365).

These men were indeed very brave people to wage war against the powerful religious establishment, which the Church jealously guarded. Any dissent was regarded as a criminal act. In 1702, Daniel Defoe (author of Robinson Crusoe) wrote a pamphlet – The Shortest Way with Dissenter, mocking the Anglican intolerance. He was arrested, fined, imprisoned and pilloried.

For a freethinker, Reason supersedes Authority, such as Stephen Hawkins’s attempt to solve the beginning of the universe, or the Origin of man in Africa by Christopher Stringer, in contradiction to the established view that God created the universe and man, with emphasis on the experimental method of science.

FREETHINKING should be distinguished from FREETHOUGHT, which is a Catholic Jesuit invention to free God from his association with the evil of this world. It is the same for other religions. For all the man-made or natural disasters, the Hindus will dissociate God and say ‘Ishwar ki leela’ (the God’s play); for Muslims – Allah ki meharbani (the grace of Allah), and for Christians – the will of God.

It was about thirty years ago when I was stirred by a feverish dissent against the authority of religion by the steady triumph of historic events created by freethinkers. It was an expression of decay of imaginative joy and rapt wonder stimulated by the lack of evidence of God’s presence in this visible world.

Now, a post-modernist (apparent realities are only social constructs and therefore subject to change) and relativist (truth and justification are somehow relative to something else) eras
(2)
have begun to shape my view of the reality of God.

The 20th century will be remembered more for the failure of communism than any other disaster. The Soviet Union, which was launched with high hopes for the proletariat, soon became one of the most oppressive states in the world.

With the collapse of the Soviet Communist regime in 1991 due to economic failure there has been restoration of religion in Russia. Though no more than 5-10 per cent takes their faith seriously it is fashionable to be religious in Russia to identify themselves in a new society.

Oxford’s McGrath, atheist turned religionist, discerns that the cause of the collapse was because, for once in power, atheism delivered not enlightenment in utopia but rather barbarism in the gulag. Politically discredited and imaginatively exhausted, atheism has been forced into an astonishing defeat before advancing Pentecostal preachers and Christian fabulists.

Those who believe in the rights of dissenters like me have considered the unreality of God from his long history of inability to protect humanity from inter-ethnic murders, Jihadis, natural and man-made disasters.

My religious indignation at the lack of divine retribution for all these atrocities that must be an offence against ‘God’s truth’ gives me an intellectual challenge in the authenticity of his existence.

The conflicting human imagination of the active commitment of God in the welfare of humanity is petering out by advances in science.

The 20th century witnessed the discovery of many wonderful advances in physics and cosmology, starting with Stephen Hawkins’s Theory of the Big Bang and the Blake Hole.
The world woke up to the sound of drumbeat of the discovery of the scientific universe for the first time. Now we are witnessing the exploration of the relationship of humanity to the Newtonian Universe.

Newton’s universe was based on absolute space and time, to which we have no direct access. It is similar to God’s existence. How would we know what God says if we hear him only through what some people say. Only the very pious and schizophrenics can claim to have heard God speak.

As Newton’s theory of motion, partly relying on god’s help was unsatisfactory it was replaced by a new theory of motion by Albert Einstein. The application of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity has led us to our understanding of the cosmos. We have seen the technology of the lasers and semiconductors based on Quantum mechanics and new physics.

The Theory of Quantum Dynamics and the application of photons have allowed us to look deeper into what we have until now called the mysteries of God. Unlike laser that can slice through solid steel, photon beams allow us to transmit thousands of telephone conversations and myriads of internet connections to inhabit the same fibre optic cable without destroying it.

We do know that the universe is not only expanding but also accelerating, as observed by Edwin Hubble’s telescope. We know the existence of Quasars which are extremely distant star-like objects. They are the power source of radio-waves and other forms of energy.

A Black Hole is a region of space that has so much concentration of massive dense objects generating so much strong gravity that nothing, not even light can escape its grip.
(3)
Unlike scientists, asking theologians and philosopher about the existence of God will end up with slapstick answers such as, everybody has a father and thus there must a God, but God does not have a father; because God is God.

It’s like asking someone how long a piece of string is. Back comes the answer that it is twice the half of its length. When I was a trainee doctor in Newcastle, I went to buy a refill for my
Parker ball pen. I asked the girl shop assistant how long it will write. She thought I was daft
and gave me a daft reply – it depends how fast you write. The correct scientific answer should be 5 miles.

In the 4th century, St Augustine who was a philosopher and theologian posed the question of the beginning of the universe in his book ‘Confession’. He came up with a strikingly modern daft answer: “Before God created the world there was no time and thus ‘no before’. There was no ‘then”. It cuts no ice for me.

Nothing slips more glibly from the tongue than the word God – Omigod. The image of God is avant-garde of early human thoughts, dreamed up in the febrile minds in search of an audience. Others were simply brain-stormed. They were longing to find if there was anything beyond their world, someone so powerful who could create the universe. They thought for an answer.

From time out of mind, men always had a quest for the unknown and untried, death, and life after death. The emergence of man-made unified God was of fairly recent origin but before the beginning of science.

The ancient writings of religious people were simply passionate outbursts of their idea of a supernatural something to which they gave a name – the ever-elusive God. The Sanskrit Vedas were such outbursts.

I am painfully aware of my religious heterodoxy that might be regarded by many as a kind of innuendo as well as a dastardly dose of mockery. That is not the intention. We live in democracy and in a democracy we are allowed to think and act differently.

People should have freedom to think and question in all subjects ranging from the theories of science to the origin of Meitei language. But everyone should be able to explain in what he believes in. Anybody who thinks Meiteilon is Tibetoburman should be able to explain why, as I have done the opposite. I am also conscious that more reasons will certainly be needed to sort out this problem.

However, the problem of the origin of the universe no longer belongs to the metaphysics or religion, and the laws of science may hold even at the beginning of the universe.

It is the high noon for God to come out and explain himself why we should believe in him/her/neuter. Until then I will keep my options open to myself, if you do not mind.

The writer is based in the UK
Email: imsingh@onetel.com
Website: www.drimsingh.co.uk

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/05/how-i-became-a-freethinker-discomfited-by-religious-constraints/

Wise old Socrates

Socrates is such an important figure in the root history of modernity. His famous aphorism, “The unexamined life is not worth living” is a central tenet of modern times. He dared those around him to question their lives, to take nothing for granted, to accept no authority but that of their mind.

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh

Many years ago while I was researching to write a book, I studied many theologians and philosophers. Among them I liked Socrates best. He mixed pleasure with his studies as I did. It is more than 2,400 years since his death, but his philosophies are remarkably relevant today.

Socrates is such an important figure in the root history of modernity. His famous aphorism, “The unexamined life is not worth living” is a central tenet of modern times. He dared those around him to question their lives, to take nothing for granted, to accept no authority but that of their mind.

At his trial Socrates was asked to retract his teachings in order to save his life. “Go and f… yourself” was his reply. He taunted the jury, saying that he should get free dinners for life for his service to the city of Athens. He believed in the type of life he led, the life of thinking for himself, and was willing to die for this value. Indeed he died for it.

Socrates was sentenced to death, mainly because he was thought to be against ‘democracy’. He did say that he thought most intelligent people should make decisions for everybody. However, he could not be charged for these opinions.
He was formally charged for two reasons: (1) for corrupting youth and (2) piety – not acknowledging the gods of the city and introducing new gods.

The jury in his trial was chosen by lottery from male citizen volunteers. After the jury decided he was guilty, his punishment was also voted on. It was decided by the majority that he would be forced to drink hemlock (a poisonous liquid) to kill himself.

After the sentence was heard he took a mouthful of hemlock and addressed the court. His last words were, “The hour of departure has arrived, and we go our ways – I to die and you to live. Which is better, only God knows?”

When the last hour came; his chains were taken off, and he was allowed to converse freely with his friends. He sent away his weeping wife in order that her grief might not interfere with the discussion.

The records of Socrates’ philosophical works are like the Bible in that he left no writings behind him. The only records are through the Dialogues of Plato, and the records and works of Xenophon, an Ancient Greek historian. Plato was his disciple.

Socrates lived from 469 -399 BCE. There was democracy in Greece at that time. As a young man he served in the Peloponnesian War. Later he worked as a stone mason to support his wife and three children. When he inherited some money from his father, he had spare time to try to understand one’s values and motivations.

He said he was wise because he admitted he was ignorant, and that it was imperative to pursue knowledge all of one’s life. He also believed that a person had to do what he thought was right, no matter what. To be happy and fulfilled, a person had to keep his soul healthy. This was done by always learning, self-examination, and gaining wisdom.

Socrates was a man of the streets, drinking, partying and sweating out in the gym in Athens. He had many young men who listened to him and participated in dialogue with him. It was through this dialogue that he guided them to see things in a different way and delve into the true nature of things.

Through the dialogue, he would help students think for themselves and figure out the basic meaning of concepts like friendship, truth, and democracy. This method later became the “Socratic method”, and is sometimes called “guided reasoning.”

He was indifferent to worldly success. He berated his peers for a selfish pursuit of material gain. He questioned the value of going to fight under an ideological banner of “democracy”. He questioned many things, such as religion, governments, and ethics. Socrates’ main mission was to find the best way to live on earth. Some of his main philosophies are:

“It is not living that matters, but living rightly.”
“All men’s souls are immortal, but the souls of the righteous are immortal and divine.”
“False words are not always evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil.”
“The unexamined life is not worth living.”
“One who is injured ought not to return the injury, for on no account can it be right to an injustice; and is not right to return an injury, or to do evil to any man, however much we have suffered from him.”

Socrates was not really against democracy. He meant that the word “democracy” is not a magician’s aba kadabra (Arabic meaning ‘let the things be destroyed’) that with the mumble of this word all ills of the humanity will automatically disappear.

The famous “Socratic method” of debate (Method Elenchus or Socratic debate) is a dialectical method, which I used in my book, the Origin of the Meiteis of Manipur. It is a form of debate between individuals with opposing viewpoints based on asking and answering questions to stimulate critical thinking and to illuminate ideas.

Socrates is described by some as the world’s first ideological martyr. Plato was a student of Socrates and the teacher of Aristotle. Socrates was almost certainly an atheist. He argued reason should prevail over religion/spirituality. He would toss religious dogma if it did not meet the reason test. Like a scientist, he would be prepared to change his views based on modern thinking and new technology.

The Poet Mellitus prosecuted Socrates at his trial as questioning ‘what is above and below’. In another sense, Socrates was questioning the Gods. Mellitus calls Socrates an atheist in which he does not believe in any God such as Zeus, Chronis and Uranus. who were believed by many people in Athens at that time. Socrates not only questioned their existence but also their accomplishments.

Socrates is famous for many thought-provoking short-sayings. The one I like best: To fear death, my friends, is only to think ourselves wise, without being wise; for it is to think that we know what we do not know.

For anything that men can tell, death may be the greatest good that can happen to them; but they fear it as if they knew quite well that it was the greatest of evils. And what is this but that shameful ignorance of thinking that we know what we do not know?

Death, says Socrates, is the separation of soul and body – the separation of mind and body. This is similar to the Hindu philosophy of Dualism (Dvaita). In theology, there is the concept that human has two basic natures: the physical and the spiritual

Socrates describes the fate of souls after death: the good go to heaven, the bad to hell, the intermediate to purgatory

Socrates was considered the wisest man of his time, but he is a bit off the track by modern standards. I think it was because he lived long before science. He was not scientific in thinking.

He said “No one who has not studies philosophy and who is not entirely pure at the time of his departure is allowed to enter the company of the gods, but the lover of knowledge only.” That is only the true philosopher goes to heaven when he dies.

His courage in the face of death would have been more remarkable if he had not believed that he was going to enjoy eternal bliss in the company of gods. So, he remained calm, humorous and devoid of fear to the last moment, caring more for what he believed to be true than for anything else whatever.

The write is based in the UK
e-Mail: imsingh@onetel.com
Website: www.drimsingh.co.uk

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/05/wise-old-socrates/

Who said prayer is not a waste of time

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh Pope Benedict XVI. He said on May 18 2007: “He… more »

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh

Pope Benedict XVI. He said on May 18 2007: “He who prays does not waste his time, even if the situation has all the markings of being an emergency and seems to push in towards action alone.”

Every time an incumbent Pope gets ill, the Catholic people worldwide (app. 2 billion) pray that he recovers quickly. The Pope is 85 in April 2012. Perhaps, the prayers are helping him.
I wish him well.

According to Caroline Piigozzi and Marco Polity – the authors of two books, the Pope is believed to have had a heart operation and two minor strokes while still a cardinal (Joseph Ratzinger). He suffers from Atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beats). He has a painful right leg and is now using a stick.

My paper however, is to clarify with the Pope that that prayer is useless because prayer is a reverent petition to God – the God in all caps, whose existence has never been proved, while life is a part, an infinitely small part of nature’s plan. Death, disease, decay and accidents are parts of her inscrutable design. The concept of life is related to consciousness and existence.

Prayer cannot prevent death. Death is not God-ordained. Nor is there a scientific death gene in our chromosomes. Diseases are incidental depending on hygiene, standard of living and diet. Decay is part of the wear and tear of old age. Accidents happen from a variety of factors such as lack of concentration, unsafe conditions, carelessness, faulty equipment and so on.

As I am talking of science I need data. There is the latest Cochrane review (November 9 2011). This 69 page manuscript is a meta-analysis of 10 prospective randomised studies on intercessory prayers to help the efforts of modern medicine over 7,000 patients. Some studies showed benefit, while others did not. So the authors concluded that there is no indisputable proof that intercessory prayers improve mortality rates.

Personally, I found praying to God was a complete waste of time. It was a bit of let down for me in my childhood when I prayed to him every night for a two-wheel boy’s bicycle for me as a graduation from my three-wheeled infant bike. The cycle never arrived. Still, I continued to pray occasionally, even well into my young adult years, whenever I was worried about something, just in case.

Prayer mania spiralled into surreal fantasy until late in the 20th century. The ancient belief in the romantic idea of prayer phenomenon refused to accept the futility of chasing an illusion – a prayer phenomenon.

God is addressed in a liturgy of prayers of various world religions. Prayers involving the name of a God have become established as a common spiritual practice in both the West and the East.

Many people are still unable to open up and analyse that prayer is not an email to God, asking him to deliver something a person has requested.

Up to this autumn of my life, I have seen no evidence of any divine presence throughout my entire life. I am totally convinced that prayer is a waste of time either because there is no God or he is not listening.

1. (2)
For a vivid display of the uselessness of prayers without intellectual justification I will cite
one recent example, and another in our living memory.

On October 8 2005 an earthquake wiped off three generations of people in the Pakistan- administered Kashmir, killing 75,000 people. The irony is that the earthquake followed the reversion to orthodox Islamic practices by fellow Kashmiri Mirpuri men, of keeping long beards, changing into Muslim dress code and serious five prayers a day, in Bradford. The women likewise, began to dress in black Burqa, Hijab and Niqab, and everyone prayed five times a day wherever they were.

Another show of lack of benefit in prayers was sixty-odd years ago in 1947 during the Partition of India. After the Muslim violence against the Hindus in Noakhali (now in Bangladesh), hundreds of thousands of Hindus fled to Calcutta. They milled around the Sealdah Station in east Calcutta. Thousands died from starvation and disease as their prayers to their Hindu gods were not answered. Mother Teresa’s Christian God was equally unavailable except that she gave them Christian rites while dying in destitute.

It is a ridiculously useless prayer phenomenon when loud speakers are used for Hindu bhajans, Muslim aazan and Sikh Akhanda path, disturbing everybody in the locality populated by many religious groups. It is unprofitable to the person and others.

For the Meitei of Manipur (India) of which I am one, when misfortune befell a person, perhaps with a stroke or cancer, a family member would consult an astrologer who would then work out on his horoscope with a small fee, that certain planet especially the Saturn was influencing the person.

A remedy would be a prayer with a bizarre array of offerings to the planet, such as a few grains of rice, milk from a black cow, a tuft of certain grass (Tingthou), a few grams of gold etcetera. Or, he might suggest a dish of rice pudding and a bunch of bananas.

All these beliefs are beyond educated intelligence and bereft of any scientific merit. But people do believe them as they believe in a God and superstition. There are transient psychological benefits, no doubt.

The prayer phenomenon was traditionally believed to be fruitful in the 20th century, but the growing impact of scientific advances and interpretations of the non-existence of God though not agreed my many, have led many people to abandon it in favour of a more metaphysical understanding of the hopelessness of prayers.

Religions began before science when the earth was regarded as the centre of the universe, not a planet that orbits round the sun. For our ancestors God was a simple answer to a complex of their problems.

For a prayer one needs a God. Without God prayer is invalid. But the delightful praise for the wonders and the infinity of God does not stand up to the New Age model of God. All these flamboyant words in praise of God merely rent crass absurdities and serve only as a gigantic collective imagery of a living God.

The religious leaders objectify and universalise the reality of the existence of God by citing
spiritual promises which can not be proven to fulfil.

Prayers are not electromagnetic waves (like radio and TV waves and cell phones) with which you can communicate with God. They were invented to glorify so many gods, such as fertility
(3)
god, harvest god, sun, rain, wind etc. Monotheism was a brilliant invention to bring all these gods into one powerful single God who will provide everything if you pray according to rules of a brand of religions.

Most of us have the religion of our parents, which makes our religion a matter of chance. There is no way of being sure which religion and God are the “real” ones, and which one of them is going to answer our prayers.

The raison d’être of prayer is faith in God with the hope that what one is asking for has a fair chance of deliverance. For some unfortunates it is the cutting age of hopelessness, like a drowning man trying to clutch at a floating straw, hoping that it might save his life.

Hope is not self-filling spa water, which God keeps topping up. We have to have a cut-off point when we see that prayer does not work.

The importance of prayers is simply the delight in the brief but elegant uplift of human heart to God, who people imagine, is listening to them. The motto of my St Joseph’s College/school in Darjeeling, was “Sursum Chorda – lift up your heart (to God).

Daily prayers were introduced as they plucked at the heartstrings of the believers, recognising the interrelationship between musical harmony and vocal human hearts with a reawakening of the mind and the senses.

The lissom harmonised music elevates human thoughts to some sort of inner spiritualism from the fevered part of consciousness. It gives people an extra piquancy to their hype, a farrago in their obsession with God in quite an adolescent way.

In reality, a prayer leaves nothing of substance when faced with the challenging world of modern living. The chance of a camel going through the eye of a needle is more likely than a salient woman’s prayer answered when asking God to save her husband dying of lung cancer (that invariably kills the patient within one year of diagnosis, prayer or no prayer).

A study in ’American Psychologists’ (January 2003, Religion and Spirituality to physical health) failed to find evidence to support a link between depth of religiousness and physical health. There were consistent failures to support the hypothesis that religion or spirituality slows the progression of cancer or improves recovery from acute illness but some evidence that religion and spirituality impedes recovery from an acute illness.

And for me, prayer is a waste of time.

The writer is based in the UK
Email: imsingh@onetel.com
Website: www.drimsingh.co.uk

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/04/who-said-prayer-is-not-a-waste-of-time/

WHO SAID PRAYER IS NOT A WASTE OF TIME

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh Pope Benedict XVI. He said on May 18 2007: “He… more »

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh

Pope Benedict XVI. He said on May 18 2007: “He who prays does not waste his time, even if the situation has all the markings of being an emergency and seems to push in towards action alone.”

Every time an incumbent Pope gets ill, the Catholic people worldwide (app. 2 billion) pray that he recovers quickly. The Pope is 85 in April 2012. Perhaps, the prayers are helping him.
I wish him well.

According to Caroline Piigozzi and Marco Polity – the authors of two books, the Pope is believed to have had a heart operation and two minor strokes while still a cardinal (Joseph Ratzinger). He suffers from Atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beats). He has a painful right leg and is now using a stick.

My paper however, is to clarify with the Pope that that prayer is useless because prayer is a reverent petition to God – the God in all caps, whose existence has never been proved, while life is a part, an infinitely small part of nature’s plan. Death, disease, decay and accidents are parts of her inscrutable design. The concept of life is related to consciousness and existence.

Prayer cannot prevent death. Death is not God-ordained. Nor is there a scientific death gene in our chromosomes. Diseases are incidental depending on hygiene, standard of living and diet. Decay is part of the wear and tear of old age. Accidents happen from a variety of factors such as lack of concentration, unsafe conditions, carelessness, faulty equipment and so on.

As I am talking of science I need data. There is the latest Cochrane review (November 9 2011). This 69 page manuscript is a meta-analysis of 10 prospective randomised studies on intercessory prayers to help the efforts of modern medicine over 7,000 patients. Some studies showed benefit, while others did not. So the authors concluded that there is no indisputable proof that intercessory prayers improve mortality rates.

Personally, I found praying to God was a complete waste of time. It was a bit of let down for me in my childhood when I prayed to him every night for a two-wheel boy’s bicycle for me as a graduation from my three-wheeled infant bike. The cycle never arrived. Still, I continued to pray occasionally, even well into my young adult years, whenever I was worried about something, just in case.

Prayer mania spiralled into surreal fantasy until late in the 20th century. The ancient belief in the romantic idea of prayer phenomenon refused to accept the futility of chasing an illusion – a prayer phenomenon.

God is addressed in a liturgy of prayers of various world religions. Prayers involving the name of a God have become established as a common spiritual practice in both the West and the East.

Many people are still unable to open up and analyse that prayer is not an email to God, asking him to deliver something a person has requested.

Up to this autumn of my life, I have seen no evidence of any divine presence throughout my entire life. I am totally convinced that prayer is a waste of time either because there is no God or he is not listening.

1. (2)
For a vivid display of the uselessness of prayers without intellectual justification I will cite
one recent example, and another in our living memory.

On October 8 2005 an earthquake wiped off three generations of people in the Pakistan- administered Kashmir, killing 75,000 people. The irony is that the earthquake followed the reversion to orthodox Islamic practices by fellow Kashmiri Mirpuri men, of keeping long beards, changing into Muslim dress code and serious five prayers a day, in Bradford. The women likewise, began to dress in black Burqa, Hijab and Niqab, and everyone prayed five times a day wherever they were.

Another show of lack of benefit in prayers was sixty-odd years ago in 1947 during the Partition of India. After the Muslim violence against the Hindus in Noakhali (now in Bangladesh), hundreds of thousands of Hindus fled to Calcutta. They milled around the Sealdah Station in east Calcutta. Thousands died from starvation and disease as their prayers to their Hindu gods were not answered. Mother Teresa’s Christian God was equally unavailable except that she gave them Christian rites while dying in destitute.

It is a ridiculously useless prayer phenomenon when loud speakers are used for Hindu bhajans, Muslim aazan and Sikh Akhanda path, disturbing everybody in the locality populated by many religious groups. It is unprofitable to the person and others.

For the Meitei of Manipur (India) of which I am one, when misfortune befell a person, perhaps with a stroke or cancer, a family member would consult an astrologer who would then work out on his horoscope with a small fee, that certain planet especially the Saturn was influencing the person.

A remedy would be a prayer with a bizarre array of offerings to the planet, such as a few grains of rice, milk from a black cow, a tuft of certain grass (Tingthou), a few grams of gold etcetera. Or, he might suggest a dish of rice pudding and a bunch of bananas.

All these beliefs are beyond educated intelligence and bereft of any scientific merit. But people do believe them as they believe in a God and superstition. There are transient psychological benefits, no doubt.

The prayer phenomenon was traditionally believed to be fruitful in the 20th century, but the growing impact of scientific advances and interpretations of the non-existence of God though not agreed my many, have led many people to abandon it in favour of a more metaphysical understanding of the hopelessness of prayers.

Religions began before science when the earth was regarded as the centre of the universe, not a planet that orbits round the sun. For our ancestors God was a simple answer to a complex of their problems.

For a prayer one needs a God. Without God prayer is invalid. But the delightful praise for the wonders and the infinity of God does not stand up to the New Age model of God. All these flamboyant words in praise of God merely rent crass absurdities and serve only as a gigantic collective imagery of a living God.

The religious leaders objectify and universalise the reality of the existence of God by citing
spiritual promises which can not be proven to fulfil.

Prayers are not electromagnetic waves (like radio and TV waves and cell phones) with which you can communicate with God. They were invented to glorify so many gods, such as fertility
(3)
god, harvest god, sun, rain, wind etc. Monotheism was a brilliant invention to bring all these gods into one powerful single God who will provide everything if you pray according to rules of a brand of religions.

Most of us have the religion of our parents, which makes our religion a matter of chance. There is no way of being sure which religion and God are the “real” ones, and which one of them is going to answer our prayers.

The raison d’être of prayer is faith in God with the hope that what one is asking for has a fair chance of deliverance. For some unfortunates it is the cutting age of hopelessness, like a drowning man trying to clutch at a floating straw, hoping that it might save his life.

Hope is not self-filling spa water, which God keeps topping up. We have to have a cut-off point when we see that prayer does not work.

The importance of prayers is simply the delight in the brief but elegant uplift of human heart to God, who people imagine, is listening to them. The motto of my St Joseph’s College/school in Darjeeling, was “Sursum Chorda – lift up your heart (to God).

Daily prayers were introduced as they plucked at the heartstrings of the believers, recognising the interrelationship between musical harmony and vocal human hearts with a reawakening of the mind and the senses.

The lissom harmonised music elevates human thoughts to some sort of inner spiritualism from the fevered part of consciousness. It gives people an extra piquancy to their hype, a farrago in their obsession with God in quite an adolescent way.

In reality, a prayer leaves nothing of substance when faced with the challenging world of modern living. The chance of a camel going through the eye of a needle is more likely than a salient woman’s prayer answered when asking God to save her husband dying of lung cancer (that invariably kills the patient within one year of diagnosis, prayer or no prayer).

A study in ’American Psychologists’ (January 2003, Religion and Spirituality to physical health) failed to find evidence to support a link between depth of religiousness and physical health. There were consistent failures to support the hypothesis that religion or spirituality slows the progression of cancer or improves recovery from acute illness but some evidence that religion and spirituality impedes recovery from an acute illness.

And for me, prayer is a waste of time.

The writer is based in the UK
Email: imsingh@onetel.com
Website: www.drimsingh.co.uk

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/04/who-said-prayer-is-not-a-waste-of-time/

How I found and lost God

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh When being asked by Napoleon why he had made no… more »

Dr. Irengbam Mohendra Singh

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh

When being asked by Napoleon why he had made no mention of God in his book about the universe – Mécanique céleste [celestial mechanics], French mathematician and astronomer, Marquis de Laplace  (1749- 1827), replied: “ I have no need for that hypothesis.”

As people all over the world, religious or non-religious sang:  ding dong diggidy ding dong to celebrate the New Year’s Day. I wrote this article for the year 2012 to bring good news from Nature.

The good news is that science will prevail and there is no need to lose your God(s) to whom you want to snuggle for comforts when you are in a state of suffering and want as a result of physical circumstances or extreme poverty.

Now scientists are almost able to explain the emergence of the first cell from the earth’s “primordial soup” from which all life originated without the need for God.

When I was little, I believed in non-personal Hindu gods from the stories told by my parents, which gave me delight in the colourful vision of heaven, and from the sensual pleasures reflected in the air of religious celebrations.

As I grew up, I saw divinity implicit in the creation all around me, perceived as integral elements in the dynamic of God’s synthesis. God was the fantastical paragon untouched by human morality. The closeness between God and me climaxed during religious functions, and whenever I anticipated a heavenly recompense for my unstinting prayers in my childhood innocence.

All that began to change as I studied physics and biology in school and college. When I became a doctor, I realised that a philosophical rhapsody in all aspects of creation was no substitute for the frail and disease-infested Third World. The question of the truth of the existence of God is one thing, but the question of his usefulness is another.

In Richard Dawkins’ book – The God Hypothesis, he identifies two concepts of God(s): (1) an abstract, impersonal God (such as found in Hinduism) and (2) a personal God (found in monotheistic religions – Christianity, Islam and Hebrew) who is the creator of the universe, interested in human beings and should be worshipped day and night.

The existence of the latter type of God is what Dawkins calls the “God Hypothesis”. He maintains that the existence of such a God, if real, would have effects in the physical universe and like any other hypothesis, can be tested and falsified.

Dawkins argues against the main philosophical argument in favour of God’s existence ie the argument from design for longer consideration. Dawkins concludes that evolution by natural selection can explain apparent design in nature.

He writes that one of the greatest challenges to the human intellect has been to explain ‘how the complex, improbable design in the universe arises’, and suggests that there are two competing explanations:

1.       A hypothesis involving a designer God, that is, a complex being to account for the complexity that we see.

2.       A hypothesis with supporting theories that explains how from simple origins and principles, something more complex can emerge.

To me, God hypothesis is a haze. It is like looking through your eye glasses while standing in heavy rain. For me the haze began to clear up many years ago as a response to a newfound embrace of modern scientific ideas.

The fossilised remains of animals and early humans are eye openers to how they survived and how they perished. We have firm evidence of how the evolutionary process had been continuing for millions of years. We have now enough scientific evidence to convince us that the earth, the nature and the universe had not been static and could not have been static.

Scientists have the combination of available fossils and genetic evidence to show that the split between humans and chimpanzees occurred in less than 4 million years ago, and the gorilla line of split from our ancestral line just before the human-chimp split.

The fossil evidence shows that the split occurred in the African Great Rift Valley region. The region became drier and forests dwindled. About 2 million years ago, during the Ice Age, the first member of humans – Homo erectus with a brain capacity of about 900 cubic centimetres started to spread, evolving into a brain capacity of 1,100 cubic centimetres, and finally to modern human (Homo sapiens) brain of 1,369 cubic centimetres.

The problem of quantifying all of the steps of human evolution and what turned monkeys into humans have so far been unable but we are nearing the upper rung of the ladder, with the beginning of this New Year. It must have been something with the massive changes the earth had undergone over the eons.

In terms of finding intelligent life (Homo sapiens), regardless of God or Nature, Earth is the most suitable planet because of its habitable temperature and existence of water. Varieties of life exploded in the Cambrian period.

The Cambrian period is the beginning of the Palaeozoic era that lasted until 225 million years ago; followed by Mesozoic era (225 -65 million years ago and the Cainozoic era (65 million years ago up to date). Everything before the Cambrian explosion, 3.5 billion years of geological time is called the Precambrian, with no dramatic changes but the oceans swarmed with single-celled life.

The Precambrian fossil record indicates that life appeared soon after the Earth was formed. This would imply that life appeared within several hundred million years when conditions became favourable. Generally accepted scientific estimates of the age of the Earth place its formation (along with the rest of the Solar system) at about 4.55 billion years old.

According to scientists, unicellular life was found 3.8 years ago, from the fossil remains of actual cells that have been recovered from rocks dated at around 3.6 billion years old. These cells are known as prokaryotes, which existed for at least 2.2 billion years.

Between 5 and 4.5 billion years ago, the sun and other planets formed from matter in our solar system because of gravity. It has been estimated by many scientists that about 3.9 billion years ago, the earth cooled down and had an atmosphere that contained the right mixture of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and carbon to allow for the formation of life.

They also believe that energy derived from heat, lightening and radioactive elements caused the synthesis of complex proteins and nucleic acids into strands of replicating genetic code. They were the building blocks of life.

These molecules then organised and evolved to form the first simple forms of life.  Around 3.8 billion years ago, conditions became ripe for the fossilisation of the earth’s early cellular life forms. These fossilised cells resemble present day cyanobacteria. Such cells are known as prokaryotes. These simple cells contain few specialised cellular structures and their DNA (nucleus) is not surrounded by a membranous envelope.

About 2.1 billion years ago they evolved into more complex cells of animals and plants known as eukaryotes that have a membrane-bound nucleus and many specialised structures located within their cell boundary.

By 680 million years ago, eukaryotic cells began to organise themselves into multicellular organisms. Starting around 570 million years ago, an enormous diversion of multicellular life made its appearance on earth, different species arriving at different times. The last Hominid line began its evolution 20-15 million years ago.

Most of the information scientists have about the evolution of animal life in the Cambrian period comes from the study of fossils in the Burgess Shale – a geological rock formation in the Canadian Rockies. But scientists do not completely agree on how to interpret the evidence in evolutionary terms. It needs time.

For a long time scientists believed that about 3.85 billion years ago something happened on earth. Somehow or other, tiny clumps of chemicals clumped together and started behaving as if they were alive. That was the beginning of the emergence of the first simple celled organism.

Those cells made more cells just like themselves. Thus began the beginning of life on earth. The human presence on this earth was relatively recent, about 13,000 years ago at the end of the last Ice Age.

Scientists have now gone further in proving that life indeed did start from chemicals. It is now widely agreed that life arose spontaneously by natural processes on this earth 3.85 billion years ago. It is a theory but not a speculative one. The clues not surprisingly, came from life itself, the earth, outer space and laboratory experiments.

Professor Conway Morris, an English Palaeontologist, who agrees with Darwin, says: “Although it seems at first sight difficult to fit many of the bizarre-looking fossils from the Burgess Shale into known groups, such as phyla, on closure inspection, rather than representing extinct phyla, the weird and wonderful fossils from the early Cambrian actually provide insight into how the present phyla evolved.

He believes in the continuity and interrelatedness of life on earth, including the origin of human beings.

Given my own struggle to believe in the existence of God, I have come to agree with Albert Camus (1913-60), a French philosopher, that God had indeed been used in the past to stunt creativity as a blanket answer to all the problems of humanity.

In the continuing battle between faith and logic I changed from my childhood encounter with a punitive God and broadened the angle on which I view my life. I lost the God that I found as a birthright from my parents and the community.

The writer is based in the UK
Email: imsingh@onetel.com
Website: www.drimsingh.co.uk

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/04/how-i-found-and-lost-god/

A new human cousin discovered

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh While God has been elusive for eternity, refusing to unfold… more »

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh

While God has been elusive for eternity, refusing to unfold his mysteries, if we look back in time we will find that we have begun to unravel the mysteries of nature with vast changes in our intellectual achievements, such as Gödel’s theorem, molecular biology and Wittgenstein’s antiphilosophy.

In the midst of all these, archaeologists and geneticists were flabbergasted at the discovery of a new human cousin. Professor Chris Stringer, human origins researcher at London’s Natural History Museum, one of the leading proponents of the recent single (African) origin hypothesis, remarked that: “This new DNA work provides an entirely new way of looking at the evolution of humans in central and eastern Asia.”

The plot is thickening about the origin of early humans who inhabited this planet of ours. There may have been seven distinct types of human ancestor from Africa who expanded to remote islands of Indonesia, Europe and Siberia.

Every one of them became extinct like the dinosaurs between thousands of years to millennia except us. It may have been because of the ingenuity, intelligence and adaptability of the Homo sapiens species that we are here today. Our brain has now reached maturity and it will not expand any more. And we are here to stay.

The surprise story began in March 2010 when scientists, led by Johannes Krause and fellow researcher, Swedish biologist Svante Paabo from Mark Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Eastern Germany, published online in the “Nature”, the finding of the DNA from a girl’s old finger bone.

The bit of bone but a huge bone for evolutionists was found in 2008 by Russian archaeologists from the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of Novosibirsk, working at the site of Denisova cave, in the Altai Krai Mountains of southern Siberia. They sent it to Leipzig for identification

A finger bone fragment from the fifth finger of a juvenile female that lived 40,000 years ago, as well as a fragment of a molar tooth, much bigger than human molar was discovered. The finger bone was found within 65 miles of known Neanderthal and modern human sites. Later in 2011, a toe bone was also unravelled (it is currently undergoing analysis).

The finger bone’s mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis showed it to be distinct from the mtDNAs of Neanderthals and modern humans. Subsequent studies on the nuclear genome from this specimen, as well as mtDNA from the tooth, determined that this group shares a common origin with Neanderthals and interbred with the ancestors of some present day Melanesians (people from the islands of Papa New Guinea) and Australian aborigines.

This juvenile hominin is now dubbed the “X-woman” (referring to the maternal descent of mtDNA), or the “Denisova hominin”. Some artefacts, including a bracelet, excavated in the cave at the same level were carbon dated to around 40,000 BP.

(2)
Prof Paabo noted that the existence of these distant branch humans creates much more complex picture of human kind during the late Pleistocene epoch. Denisova Cave is known to have also been inhabited by Neanderthal people and perhaps by modern humans. Because of the cool climate in this location, the discovery benefited from DNA’s ability to survive for longer periods at lower temperatures of the cave at 32 degrees Fahrenheight.

The analysis indicated that modern humans, Neanderthals and the Denisova hominin last shared a common ancestor around 1 million years ago. Denisovans are found to be a sister group to Neanderthals and had similar ancestors, because all non-African humans have Neanderthal DNA.

According to researchers, this provides confirmation that there were at least four distinct types of humans in existence (including Homo erectus) when anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens) first left their African homeland.

The fact that Denisovans were discovered in southern Siberia, but contributed genetic material to modern human populations in Southeast Asia suggests that their population may
have been widespread in Asia during the Pleistocene age.

The DNA analysis further indicated that these new Denisovans were the result of an earlier migration out of Africa, distinct from the later out-of-Africa migrations associated with Neanderthals and modern humans, but also distinct from the earlier migration of Homo erectus, who were to colonise Asia.

According to the co-author in the “Nature”, Richard Green of the University of California, Santa Cruz, there was probably an ancestral group that left Africa between 300,000 and 400.000 years ago and quickly diverged, with one branch becoming the Neanderthals who spread into Europe and the other branch moving east and becoming Denisovans.

When modern humans left Africa 60,000 years ago, they first encountered the Neanderthals, an interaction prevailed that left traces of Neanderthal DNA scattered throughout the genomes of all non-Africans. The other group of humans later came in contact with Denisovans leaving traces of Denisovan DNA in the genomes who settled in Melanesi – an assemblage of islands of Australia’s coast including New Guinea.

Richard Green says, “It was fruitous that this discovery came quickly on the heels of the Neanderthal genome, because we already had the team ready to do a similar analysis.” He said Denisovans were quite different from Neanderthals and modern humans. They had teeth similar to those of older human ancestors, such as Homo erectus.

The Leipzig scientist Kraus said that since the discovery was announced in March 2010, the researchers have been focussed on the task of decoding the entire 3 billion DNA building blocks in the complete genetic make-up of the newcomer from the Atlai Mountains.

The Leipzig scientists have also reported the isolation and sequencing of nuclear DNA from the Denisovan finger bone in 2010. The specimen showed an unusual preservation of DNA and low level of contamination, allowing them a detailed comparison of its genome with Neanderthal and modern humans.

They concluded that the Denisovan population along with Neanderthal shared a
common branch from the lineage leading to modern African humans.. The estimated average time of divergence between Denisovans and Neanderthals sequences is
(3)
640,000 years ago, and between both of these and the sequences of modern Africans is 804,000 years ago.

Modern genetic studies show that app. 4% of non-African modern human DNA
relates to Neanderthals. A new comparison of Denisovan genome from six modern humans, one each from South Africa, Nigeria, France, Hans Chinese, Papua New
Guinea and Bougainville islands showed that between 4% and 6% of the genome of the Melanesians derive from Denisovan population.

The scientists suggest that the genes were probably introduced during the early migration of the ancestors of Melanesians into Southeast Asia, where Denisovans once ranged widely over eastern Asia.

Mark Stoneking, molecular anthropologist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary anthropology, Leipzig, (most famous for his estimation that human
clothing originated about 72,000 years ago, by sequencing the genes of head and body
lice in 2007) led a research team, which found genetic evidence that, in addition to
Melanesians, Australian aborigines, and small, scattered groups of people in
Southeast Asia, such as Negrito of Mamanawa in the Phillipines shares Denisovan ancestry, though Andaman Islander Negritos and Malaysian Jehai, do not.

With their result, they challenged the belief that Denisovans interbred in mainland Asia before spreading to the island from Southeast Asia, Melanesia, and Australia.

Recent genetic studies in 2011 have indicated that modern humans may have mated with “at least two groups” of ancient humans: Neanderthals and Denisovans.

Ian Tatersall of the Department of Physical Anthropology at the American Museum of National History says that “We are the only hominid around today, and we tend to think that that’s how it’s always been. But the evidence is accumulating that the human evolutionary tree is quite luxuriantly branching.

Scientists have no idea what the Denisovan hominis look like. Paabo says that because the Denisova homini is assumed to be human, it’s possible that there are many unknown homini fossils waiting to be discovered. Palaeontologists will continue to scour for remnants in Siberia.

Apart from Denisovans, scientists discovered a new very strange humanlike species (published in “Nature” in 2004) that lived over the past few hundred years in the east of the last islands of Java in Indonesia – a scattered remote archipelago. The remains of this new species had been excavated in 2004, in Liang Bua Cave on the island of Flores, and hence named Homo floresiensis (aka the Hobbit). The creature was only one meter tall and very small-brained.

Homo floresiensis was considered intelligent as the cave contained evidence of tool making, butchery of animal carcasses, and fire. They survived until about 17,000 years ago. The latest studies of the Hobbit bones have led to the radical idea that these tiny people in fact, descended from something more primitive than Homo erectus – yet another species whose ancestors emerged from Africa 2 million years ago, or
(4)
more, and then evolved in isolation in Southeast Asia, finally disappearing within the last 20 millennia.

There is no knowledge of when the Neanderthals ad Homo erectus disappeared,
overwhelmed by Homo sapiens, probably because of better tools and other resources.

What stumps the scientists by the finding this strange humanlike creatures is that Africa could have been home to yet another species of humans within the last 50,000 years, based on signs of possible ancestral DNA in modern African populations and fossils found in Nigeria and Congo.

The writer is based in the UK
Email: imsingh@onetel.com
Website: www.drimsingh.co.uk

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/04/a-new-human-cousin-discovered-2/

A FUTILE JOURNEY OF A MEITEI TO FIND GOD

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh My journey of hopes and dreams of finding a God… more »

By: Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh

My journey of hopes and dreams of finding a God fell in ruins around me. It was like the Spanish conquistadors of the sixteenth century, who set off to find El Dorado – the mystic city of gold in South America. They never found it.

It had perhaps, been started upon false tracts. What began as a noble spiritual journey ended in the calm realisation that there cannot be a God

St Augustine’s journey to find God in his young adulthood ended in exhausted despair. He reports: “I had lost all hope of discovering the truth.” In the end he said God found him.

I may perhaps, be the first Meitei who set off on a journey to find God, any God. In the last leg of my journey of faith I came to perceive that life is not a journey towards God as I wrote in my book – My Search for God, published in 2003.

The core of religion is God, the provider and moral keeper of suffering humanity. Philosophy plus God is religion. The English word “God” is used by multiple religions as a noun to refer to different deities.

The God who is above scientific thinking and commands religious and political adherence to him and to whom we must pay our gratitude and personal tributes for our proud civilisations, rules humanity from a safe place in Heaven – the eclectic choice for the spiritual philosophers.

I am not a philosopher, nor am I a theologian, nor an atheist. I was simply investing myself into finding a rational view of the concept of God in the light of new scientific discoveries.
Since ‘brevity is the sole of wit’ I will be brief. For a start, I have travailed with the paradigm of God and his existence with such logical arguments in its favour as previously accepted by theologians.

The monotheist Abrahmic faiths – Jewish, Christian and Muslim religions still believe that God created human beings in the Garden of Eden (The Bible Genesis 2:8-14). The 2nd century Christians identified the place, located by the River Euphrates in Iraq, just west of the border between Iraq and Iran and just above the northern shore of the Persian Gulf.

But the present consensus among the palaeontologists and biologists is that human beings evolved through natural processes. The birthplace of humankind, according to the current consensus focuses on North East Africa.

Evolution means there has been ‘a change through time’ in certain lines of organisms giving rise to other lines or groups called macroevolution. The organisms do undergo changes during their lifespan, called microevolution.

While there is still a conflict between human evolution by natural processes, and human creation by God, evolution has now a strong standing power. It has been progressively accepted by researchers, following a series of discoveries in various fields of knowledge, conducted independently.

Even Pope John Paul II issued a message to the Pontifical Academy of Science, reaffirming the Roman Catholic Church’s long-standing position on evolution: that it does not necessarily
conflict with Christianity.
(2)
While there is no evidence for the existence of God there has been no attempt by the theologians to prove that there is a God or the validity of religion. Still there is belief that the Judeo-Christian God created this earth and everything in it.

A book appealing to Christians to accept as a proven fact the Darwinian theory of evolution, titled The Language of God, was published in 2006 by well-known genetic scientist Francis S. Collins, himself a believing non-Catholic Christian.

In his book Dr. Collins de¬clares that all living organisms have evolved from species to species by means of random change and natural selection without any intervention by God.

That human beings have evolved from lower animals and have not been created by a God has been proven by scientific methods, 150 years after Darwin’s hypothesis of evolution.

A scientific method is the process of proposing a hypothesis, and then testing its accuracy by collecting data on events the hypothesis predicts. If the predictions match the new data the
hypothesis is supported. Generally the best supported hypothesis is considered correct.

Evolution is the result of the frequency of the appearance of alleles in a population of organisms that changes over time. The alleles are the pieces of DNA that cause a particular trait eg “blue eyes” or “flat nose”.

My belief is that evolution and religion do not always contradict with each other except that the literal interpretation of the first chapter of Genesis in the Bible is unscientific and therefore unacceptable to students of evolution. They are not provable like gravity or electricity.

A religious belief can not be tested scientifically as there are no empirical tests that give different results whether the belief is true or not. Religion usually presupposes a driving force – an intelligent designer. This intelligent being is not always predictable and thus experiments judging religious beliefs cannot have predictable results.

Different religions have different names of God. For example: the Meitei Sanamahi religion has Tengbanba Mapu (Lord of the universe). The question whether different names used by different religions are equivalent has been raised and discussed.

Correlation between various theories and interpretations of the name of God, used to signify a monotheistic or ultimate Supreme Being from which all other divine attributes derive, has been a subject of ecumenical discourse between Eastern and Western scholars for over two centuries.

Many of the world’s religions are based on ‘revelations’ eg the final book of the New Testament; Krishna’s revelation in the Gita; Mohammad’s revelation in the Koran; or Yahweh’s in Torah. So are the Meitei revelations in the Puya. Usually these predictions or prophesies can not always be verified.

American creationists are forever trying to build up Christian beliefs around scientific principles. But the belief is no more a fact than painting a brick with gold paint makes it a bar of gold. They are ridiculously claiming that the Grand Canyon in Arizona was created by Noah’s Flood (Bible).

The Biblical narrative is that God became aggrieved when he saw that the earth was polluted by wickedness. He commanded Noah to build an Ark (a vessel) to save himself, his family
(3)
and the world’s animals before he sent a Great Flood to cleanse the wickedness.

What is more ludicrous is that the biblical literalists continue to explore the mountains of Ararat in present-day Turkey where the Bible says the Ark came to rest, in search of archaeological remnants of the vessel, without success.

I have just been to see the Grand Canyon in Arizona. It is 433 Km (277miles) long and 1.6 km (1 mile) deep gorge. It was formed during the six mullion years of geological activity and erosion by the Colorado River on the tectonically upraised earth’s crust.

In my search for God on the principle of free enquiry and with scientific method, the biological science began casting doubts and created difficulties for a teleological view.

I am an agnostic – a believer in the practicality of science. I look the universe in the face with an open mind for conviction. Historically, agnosticism does not merely mean a suspension of judgement. Rather it means intellectual justification for a discard of theology.

Agnosticism rose in the West after the Industrial Revolution as a by-product of the rise in the standard of living measured by GDP and increase in the Human Development Index, measured by longevity, years of education of a typical citizen.

Thomas Huxley in 1869 invented the word ‘Agnosticism’ but it took twenty years for him to openly write his essay entitled – Agnosticism. Agnostic is anti-Gnostic. Gnostic is a believer in the intuitive spiritual knowledge (of God).

An atheist is one who affirms that there is no God but he can not make a dogmatic statement on God’s non-existence. Many famous intellectuals such as George Bernard Shaw, Wordsworth, Shelley and Byron were atheists.

Atheism reared its head in 1811 when Percy Shelley (1792-1822), friend of Byron, wrote a pamphlet – The Necessity of Atheism as an undergraduate at the University College, Oxford. He was expelled from the University. Shelley argued about the development of a distinction between the workings of reason and imagination. He rejected revealed religion and its dogmas.

Many religions have different ideas of what God is and there is a disagreement whether God is male, female or neuter (Islam). The existence or non-existence of a God or Gods is a matter of faith. Our glimpse of God in this world and the next is hierarchical and ordered, and the meaning of the term religion has no single definition.

Every man should be able to give a reason for the faith that is in him, as I do. I know reality can not always been proved by logic, as logic does not always preserve the truth, It simply gives the idea about the subject matter.

And this article is my idea. Unlike St Augustine, God has not found me yet.

The writer is based in the UK
Email: imsingh@onetel.com
Website: www.drimsingh.co.uk

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/03/a-futile-journey-of-a-meitei-to-find-god/

Unani system of medicine of India and its history

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh [This is the third and the last part of a… more »

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh

[This is the third and the last part of a lecture given by the author as the first Asian President of the British medical Association of the city of Bradford and Airdale, 20 years ago in 1999; the second part – The Ayurveda Medicine has already been published in this column.]

Dr. Irengbam Mohendra Singh as president of the BMA (British Medical Association), Bradford and Airdale city in 1991.

Unani (or Yunani) medicine (Unani-tibb) is an Arab name for Greek medicine. It became an indigenised Indian medicine since the 12th century CE. Muslim invaders (Muslim writers would like to call Muslim rulers of India) from the northwest brought their own physicians and established a Sultanate in Delhi (1206-1290). Later, under the patronage of the Mughal emperors it flourished in India.

There were five unrelated dynasties that ruled India from this sultanate: (1) Slave dynasty under General Qutb-uddin-Aybak; (2) Khilji dunasty; (3) Tughlaq dynasty; (4) Sayyid dynasty; and (5) Lodi dynasty.

During the pre-independent India, it was pursued by two families of Unani physicians viz the Aziza family of Lucknow known as Hakims of Jhaawai Tola and the Sharifi family of the eminent Hakim Ajmal Khan of Delhi. In independent India it was preserved and researched by Hakim Abdul Hameed, descendents of Hakim Majeed of the famous Hamdard Dawakhana in Delhi.

The first Unani physician who came to India was from Afghanistan (Herat). His name was Hakim Diya Uddin.  He entered the Court of Khusrow Malik – the Ghaznawi ruler at Lahore in 1160 CE.

The Unani system is the same as the Greek system of philosophy of medicine, which began in Ionia in Greece at that time. Now Ionia is the west coast region of Turkey. The most useful contributors to Greek medicine were the great philosophers such as Pythagoras, Hippocrates, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle.

They believed that there are four humours (humors-American), meaning plant or animal body fluids, and four qualities. The four humours are (1) blood [dam], (2) phlegm [balgham], (3) white bile [safra] and (4) black bile (sauda]. The four qualities are (1) heat (2) cold (3) moisture and (4) dryness. Every person has an individualised humoural constitution in his healthy state. The alteration of these accrues to illness or disease.

Galen (131-201 BCE) drew these four qualities into four temperaments of people: 1. sanguine (sturdy and cheerful); 2. lethargic and emotional; [3] choleric (short- tempered and irascible); and 4. melancholic (depressive). Galen was a Greek physician who studied in the famous medical school in Alexandria in Egypt. He went to Rome and revived the ideas of Hippocrates and contemporary Greek doctors.

Prophet Mohammad was born in 570 CE and during the 7-9th century CE Islam flourished and the Greek medicine was further developed during the Arabian civilisation. In 431 CE the patriarch of Jerusalem, Nestorius was banished along with his followers for heresy as he propounded that Jesus was a demigod. That made Mary mother of human Jesus but not of God.

They immigrated to Persia and started medical schools there. These Christians translated Greek medical texts to Arabic.

Unani was developed during the 8th century CE by the Caliph of Mesopotamia (Baghdad). Sanskrit and Greek medical works were also translated under the
patronage of Caliphs Harun Rashid and Al Mansur. Two of its great physicians were Rhazes [Al-Razi 860-932] and Avicena [Ibn Sina 980-1037] .

Rhazes was a pharmacist and physician. He is especially famous for diagnosing measles as distinct from small pox. He also recognised the development of acquired immunity by recognising that individuals surviving small pox never get it again.

Avicena wrote over 450 treatises out of which 40 were on Medicine. His book, Canon of Medicine provides a complete system of medicine, based on the principles of Galen.

During the Muslim rule in India the Hakims began experimental research works and  altered the system to adapt to the changing climate, the prevalent diseases and available rich flora of India. Later on, they experimented with minerals as well.

Unani medicine has become purely indigenous to India and though it lost its tempo during the British rule, has become widely used in India again, especially among the vast Muslim population. During the last couple of decades there has been a great upsurge of Unani medicine under the patronage of the government of India.

The popularity is largely due to a great man, Hakim Abdul Hameed. Under his directorship there is a massive Unani Pharmacological Industry known as Hamdard (sympathetic) Dawakhana in Tughlabad, New Delhi.

A new massive Jamia Hamdard University was established alongside for training of undergraduates and postgraduates. It was given the status of Deemed to be University by the Ministry of Human Resource Development on May 10 1989, and was inaugurated by the late Rajiv Gandhi on August 1 1989.

In India there are now 40 Unani colleges. There are 22 research institutes all over India. More recently, and very importantly, there has been awareness for safety and adverse drug reaction monitoring of herbal drugs in Unani (and Ayurvedic system), following the guidelines of the WHO.

Unani medicine (also Ayurvedic) is used as complementary medicine to allopathic medicine, in India.

After having studied both the systems of Indian medicine I have tried to distinguish between the two and have come to this conclusion in my own way that Unani medicine is basically based on four humours theory while the Ayurvedic medicine is based on five elements (panchbhoota) theory.

In both the systems herbal medicines with or without minerals are used. In the Ayurvedic system, names are in Sanskrit, whereas in Unani system, in Arabic or
Persian. There are many other common features except that Ayurveda owes its origin to ancient Indian culture while Unani, to Greece and Arabic cultures, which have become indigenised since its arrival to India.

Both depend for their diagnosis on a holistic approach and the examination of the pulse, more developed in the Unani medicine, because of the Muslim purdah system. The Unani system of diagnosis by simply feeling the pulse is very well documented as illustrated by the following true story.

This was about a blind nabbaz – a clinician who reads the pulse (nabz). This was from news coverage in The Times, London. This blind man was an elder brother of Dr Ansari who was a doctor of western medicine, in Delhi. Mahatma Gandhi and other Congress leader used to stay with him whenever they came to Delhi.

Dr Ansari took the blind nabbaz to London. The photograph in The Times showed the blind man with a famous surgeon and Dr. Ansai. The occasion was that the surgeon was going to perform an exploratory surgery as a growth was suspected in the abdomen.

The nabbaz felt the pulse of the patient on the right wrist and then on the left wrist for about five minutes each. He then wrote down on a piece of paper that the patient had a growth, giving its size and shape as well as its location in the intestine. The operation was performed and the nabbaz was proved right.

With this marvellous story I, like many other like-minded Indian and foreign medical people, feel that the Government of India should allocate a substantial budget for research and development of the Indian systems of medicine, to provide national health care for the teeming millions of India, especially in rural areas, rather than depend on very expensive Western medicines.

Footnote:
I am more grateful than I can begin to express to the great Hakim Abdul Hameed of the Hamdard Research Foundation, Tughlabad in New Delhi, who through my industrialist friend DD Puri, met us in his office in 1998 and kindly organised his staff to show us round the museum. I want to offer my gratitude in memoriam following his death in October 1998.

On the ground floor of the museum that is five floors high, there was a very impressive granite bust of surgeon Sushruta and the exhibit of the surgical instruments used by him during the Indus valley civilisation. There were labelled jars of drugs used by physician Charaka during the same period.

To my surprise, there was an ancient statue of the Vedic god of Medicine – Dhanawantry, of which I had no idea. It is depicted as an avatar of Vishnu with four hands, one hand holding medical herbs and the other a pot containing rejuvenating nectar (amrit).

There were over 50 Ph D’s, botanists, biochemists etc who were doing research work. A residential college for the Bachelor’s degree in Unani medicine (BuM) has been added. Within the compound is the World Islamic Centre. This is a fascinating place. It is a round building with each floor devoted to various subjects of Islam. There are cubicles for research scholars. The second floor is devoted to Islamic manuscripts.

Hakimji charged no consultation fee. He treated millions of people, rich and poor alike. The profits that came from the sale of medicines went to the Trust, which made all these modern developments possible. He took only a peppercorn salary.

The writer is based in the Uk
Email: imsingh@onetel.com
Website: www.drimsingh.co.uk

Published: March 23, 2012

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/03/unani-system-of-medicine-of-india-and-its-history/

A treatise on the ancient medicine of India

By Dr. Irengbam Mohendra Singh [This is the first part of the lecture the author… more »

By Dr. Irengbam Mohendra Singh

[This is the first part of the lecture the author gave as the first Asian President of the British Medical Association of the city of Bradford and Airdale, 20 years ago in 1991. It took him 6 months of research, visiting locations in Delhi, Bangalore, Coimbatore and London]

Dr. Irengbam Mohendra Singh as president of the BMA (British Medical Association), Bradford and Airdale city in 1991.

I am going to talk of India that existed before the partition in 1947. I come from the northeast of India, Manipur, bordering on Burma. The westernmost state is Bombay. To the north is Kashmir and to the south is Madras. Though there was a great diversity in the erstwhile India, there was a sense of unity among them as “Indians”.

India is also known as Hindustan or Bharat – an old Sanskrit name after its mythical founder of Bharatbarsha. Indian civilisation is as old as that of Egypt, Persia and Mesopotamia, according to Sir John Marshall, the author of the Indus valley civilisation, who was responsible for the excavations of the cities of Mohenjo-Daro in the Sind province and Harappa in west Punjab.

These two places are 590 km apart. Harappa was discovered purely by chance by a British Army engineer deserter, James Lewis in 1826.  Mohenjo-daro was discovered in 1922 by R. D. Banerji, an officer of the Archaeological Survey of India, two years after major excavations had begun at Harappa,

The Indus valley civilisation is estimated to be five or six thousand years old. As Harappa was first discovered, Harappans are the name given to any ancient people belonging to the Indus valley civilisation.

Nobody knows who these people of the Indus Valley civilisation were and where they came from. It is quite possible that their culture was an indigenous one. From the artefacts found in the excavations such as “shiv lingam”, some scholars find an essential similarity between these people and the Dravidian races. For all practical purposes they are treated as indigenous inhabitants of India.

Gordon Childe, an archaeology professor, who specialised in European prehistory, thought that there was a sudden end to the Indus valley civilisation due to an unexplained catastrophe. The River Indus is well known for its severe floods washing away cities and villages.

While there is a definite sense of continuity between Indus valley civilisation and later periods, there were also certain breaks not only in the point of time but also in the kind of civilisation that came next, which was more agricultural to begin with. This later civilisation was brought by the ARYANS who poured into India in successive waves from the northwest.

The word Aryan (English), Arya in Sanskrit might possibly have derived from the Avestan word meaning ‘noble’. Iran is perhaps a cognate of Arya. The Aryan migration is supposed to have taken place about a thousand years after the Indus valley civilisation. Gradually, over a
matter of years these Aryan tribes became assimilated in India. From the synthesis of these foreign Aryans and indigenous Dravidians who were probably the representatives of the Indus valley civilisation grew the Indian races and Indian culture.

In the ages that followed, there came many other races to India such as Iranians, Greeks, Huns, Turks (before Islam), early Christians, Jews, and Zoroastrians. They came and made a difference and were absorbed in India in turn.

The word “Hindu” does not occur at all in the ancient Indian literature. The first reference to it is in an Indian book – a ‘Tantric’ work in the 8th century BCE, where Hindu means people and not the followers of a particular religion. The word is very old and was used for a thousand years or more by people of central and western Asia, for India, or rather for the people living on the other side of the Indus River.

The word Hindu is derived from “Sindhu” – the Indian name for Indus. The use of the word Hindu in connection with Hindu Religion is of a very late occurrence.

The all inclusive term for religion in India was Arya dharma (Aryan religion). The word dharma means more than a religion. It is from a root Sanskrit word – ‘dhar’, which means ‘to hold together’. It is an ethical concept that includes the moral code, the righteousness and a whole range of man’s duties and responsibilities.

The expression ‘Vedic dharma’ was also used in the same context, but more particularly for those who acknowledged the general authority of the Vedas. The words ‘sanatan dharma’ is also used by certain orthodox sections of Hindus who claim to follow the ancient faith. When I was a little boy I used to hear my father talk about sanatan dharma.

Before the discovery of the Indus valley civilisation the Vedas were regarded as the earliest records of Indian culture. Professor Winternitz put down the beginnings of Vedic literature as far back as 2,000- 2,500 BCE. This brings it to very near the Mohenjo-Daro period.

The Vedas were outpourings of the Aryans as they streamed to India (Pundit Nehru). Max Muller called it – the first words spoken by Aryan men. They brought their idea with them from that common stock, out of which grew Avesta (Zoroastrian religion and scripture), and elaborated it in the soil of India. Even the language of Avesta bears a striking resemblance to that of the Sanskrit.

To Hindus, the Vedas are revealed scripture like the Bible or the Quran. The Vedas (from the root word ‘vid’ = to know; vidya = knowledge) are simply a recollection of the existing knowledge of the day. They are a jumble of many things such as hymns, prayers, rituals for sacrifice, magic poetry, mythology and medicinal practice.

There were no temples of gods or idols. The early Vedic Aryans had no idea of the soul though they vaguely believed in some kind of existence after death, like all primitive people. Gradually the conception of God grew in the course of hundreds of years. Towards the end of the Veda or Vedanta in 800 BCE, the Vedic philosophy or Upanishads appeared.

The Rig Veda, the first of the Vedas (five of them) is probably the earliest book that humanity possesses. The last Veda, Upanishad deals with a ‘search for the truth’. The earlier Vedas were treated in a spirit of gentle irony though with respect. The emphasis of the Upanishad philosophy is essentially on self-realisation, the knowledge of the individual – self. The objective external world is real – an aspect of the inner reality. There is nothing higher than the person.

The Upanishad asks the question: what is this universe (samsar)? Where does it come from and where does it end? The curious answer is: “in freedom it rests and into freedom it melts away”. Though the answer is vague, there was this quest for knowledge of the universe, as we are having today.

Upanishad discusses about God and soul; the triumph of mind over environment – “My body will be reduced to ashes and my breath will join the restless and deathless air, but not I and my deeds.” In early Upanishads there were elaborate attempts to disapprove materialism as materialistic philosophy as exists now in the West, was professed in India for centuries.

These books were originally written on palm leaves or bhurja patra (inner bark of the Himalayan birch tree) and later on paper. Many were lost but 50-60 thousand manuscripts and their variations have been found.

The Upanishads, later Bhagavad-Gita or Gita contain such god-like fullness of wisdom and mystic elements, which moulded the Indian rational mind and character. All the important Hindu thoughts are enshrined in the Upanishads (Bloomfield).

The Vedas were written by rishis (munis) or seers. A rishi was like a sadhu (holy man). His life was devoted to silence and an inner life (meditation). A Rishi is one who sees, and a muni is one who keeps silent. They spent their life searching for knowledge.

When I was a little boy, my two elder sisters used to keep ‘muni’ one particular morning every year. I being naughty, often tried to break their silence for which I used to have scolding from my father.

Rishis observed that reality begins ‘in here, self’, with our consciousness and awareness, and ‘not out there’ in the environment. According to them there are three states of awareness: waking, sleeping and dreaming.

Rishis looked further – ‘para’ (beyond), transcending time and space – a sort of “transcendental meditation” as coined by Maharishi Yogi, and noticed a gap between the states of awareness. For example: there is a brief gap before falling asleep as the mind gradually leaves the waking state – consciousness. This realisation opened the possibility for them to leave the boundaries of five senses by diving through the gap.

The rishis were very keen for direct experience or observation of the cosmos. So they devised an approach known as YOGA – the Sanskrit word for union. They were looking for an approach to be able to unite with nature. From their subjective viewpoint, the only way the unified field could exist is in another state of consciousness – pure consciousness, as the basis of higher stages of development to locate a unified field of cognitive and affective processes.

This is a bit beyond my cognitive functions. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi – the great founder of Transcendental meditation did a lot to explain it in 1969- 70s, but no one was any wiser. He always talked in riddles.

The writer is based in the UK
Email: imsingh(at)onetel.com
Website: www.drimsingh.co.uk

Published: March 16, 2012

“Through Transcendental “Through Transcendental Meditation, the human brain can experience that level of intelligence which is an ocean of all knowledge, energy, intelligence, and bliss.” —Maharishi

Meditation, the human brain can experience that level of intelligence which is an ocean of all knowledge, energy, intelligence, and bliss.” —Maharishi

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/03/a-treatise-on-the-ancient-medicine-of-india/

When did humans begin to wear clothes

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh When I was in class IV in school, I still… more »

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh

Dr. Irengbam Mohendra Singh

When I was in class IV in school, I still remember, the teacher explaining in Manipuri literature why we wear clothes: ‘we wear clothes to protect us from hot and cold and for modesty.’ It is still true.

But in modernity, we also wear clothes to show who we are eg for cultural identity, such as tribal dresses, Indian dhoti; expensive and fancy dresses worn by celebrity women; for rank and station as in the Army; to indicate a profession such as doctor’s white coat, nurses’ uniforms; to make us look good and distinct, such as black dinner jacket and a black bow tie for formal functions, or customary dresses such as Manipuri bride’s Stiff wedding skirt or Indian bride’s red sari.

We also wear clothes for social possessions such as ‘Khamen chatpa’ dhoti for Manipuri courtiers, ceremonial gowns for Lords in the House of Lords, London; and to show the personality of the wearer eg hippy dresses, leather jackets for hell riders. People also wear clothes for sanitary reasons such as underpants for man and pants for female.

But nobody knows when we began to wear any kind of clothing apart from the sketch of cartoon caveman and his wife, based on the concept of the way in which early prehistoric humans might have worn shaggy animal hides. The BBC “Flintstones” series depict such attires. The concept of “cavemen” came from the findings of various paintings in caves, presumed to be Neanderthal people who must have lived in the caves to shelter from the freezing cold of the late Ice Age.

My wife and I went once inside a cave of not so distant past, of Mahabharat period at the Panchgani (five plateaus) hill station near Mahabaleswar in Maharasthra, where the five Pandav brothers took shelter in that barren open land.

Only recently, some geneticists have found out that our human ancestors began wearing clothes only about 72,000 years ago. It came about surprisingly, from the study of the evolution of human body lice.

Human lice thrive on blood. They are wingless insects that spend their entire life on humans.

Dr Smith et al of the Natural History Museum, London, have found that the human head louse evolved from the chimpanzee louse when the ancestors of humans and chimpanzees split apart some five million years ago.

The human pubic lice (crab), on the other hand are related to gorilla lice, from which it parted company some 13 million years ago. Species of human lice thus mirror the splits of the tree of ape and human evolution.

The oldest known fossils of louse eggs ie nits, are approximately 10,000 years old. Lice have been with us so long that lice related phrases such as “lousy,” “nit-picking,” and “going over things with a fine-tooth comb,” are everyday vocabulary.

Body lice killed millions of people by transmitting diseases. They helped Napoleon’s defeat in Russia by spreading disease to his army.

The head, body and pubic lice live separate life styles. The head and body lice do not normally interbreed (could do in laboratory). There is no interbreeding with pubic lice.

Human lice are no respecter of social class or cleanliness. The term ‘nit’ mainly refers to the egg. One generation lasts about one month. They have 4-5 meals a day by sucking blood of the host. When they bite they inject saliva that contains a chemical, which prevents blood from clotting (like mosquitoes’). Then they suck up blood. While feeding, lice may excrete dark red faeces on to the skin.

They move like monkeys, using powerful claw-like legs to transfer from hair to hair. Their claws can grip up to six hairs simultaneously to prevent them from being dislodged.

A geneticist, Mark Stoneking et al, at the Max-Plank Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzic, Germany in 1999, studied the DNA of body lice and published a paper on August 19 2003 that human head lice and body lice differ in their habitat on the host. The body lice feed exclusively on the body but lives in clothing, while the head lice live and feed on the scalp only.

Their hypothesis was that when humans lost their body hair, the lice population became confined to the head and pubic areas.

After millions of years when people started to wear clothes, the head lice evolved into a new variety of body lice that could live in clothing. The body lice became larger and developed claws specialised for grasping material but not for grasping shafts of hair.

Stoneking et al collected head and body lice from people living in countries around the world. He studied the genetic material from the body and head lice. Knowing the rate at which variations accumulate on DNA over centuries, he calculated the dates of variations of branch points in the lice family tree. The branch point at which the body lice first evolved from the head lice turned out to be around 72,000 years ago.

The finding showed that humans began to wear clothes about 72,000 years ago. There are no archaeological findings to support the finding as clothes could not have survived so long.

Their study also showed that there is a greater diversity in African than non-African lice, suggesting an African origin of human lice. They also estimated the origin of the body lice

about 107,000 years ago in Africa that correlates with the spread of anatomically modern humans from Africa.

Another very recent article by David Reed et al on Lice DNA Study, published in ‘Science Daily’, University of Florida on May 1 2011, shows that Modern humans started wearing clothes about 170.000 years ago.

The new study seems more accurate partly because new data on lice evolution began to develop only during the last 20 years with newer calculation methods. It is also because humans must have started wearing clothes during the last Ice Age for survival.

The last Ice Age occurred about 120,000 years ago, but the study suggests that humans started wearing clothes in the age preceding the last Ice Age, 170,000 years ago.

The simple theory is that as the body lice prefer to live in human clothing, the natural assumption would be that the body lice were not around before humans began to wear clothes. Put it the other way, the body lice evolved from head lice at about the time when humans began wearing clothes.

What the scientists have done is to study the molecular genetics of lice. The study would make it possible when the body lice separated from the head lice, by measuring the difference in the genomes of the two species and then observing the rate of change in the genomes ie gene mutations.

Lice are chosen for this scientific study because unlike other parasites, they are stranded on lineages of hosts over long periods of evolutionary time.

David Reed et al’s findings are totally in agreement with the findings of Prof Curtis Marean of the Institute of Arizona State University, who led an International Team that carried out excavations of a series of caves at Pinnacle Point, Mossel Bay. There they discovered the presence of Middle Stone Age people, 170,000 years ago.

They found the earliest evidence of human consumption of shell fish, evidence of heat treatment, rocks to make stone tools, and the use of ochre to beautify. Their conclusion is that between 400-700 of these Homo sapiens (thinking men and women) survived the Ice Age in Mossel Bay with a mild climate and by eating roots, seeds and so on, along with shell fish as proteins. Middle Stone Age (Palaeolithic) people are known to have clothed themselves by draping animal hides, sometimes bound with sinew.

Mossel Bay has become a hot potato for archaeology in the last few years since Prof. Marean delivered the opening address to the 44th Nobel Conference at the Gustavus Adolphus College in St Peter, Minnesota, on October 7 2008. In this lecture, “The African evidence for the Origins of Modern Human Behaviour”, he explained that the climate, vegetation and geography of the Mossel Bay area provided perfect living conditions for the core population of about 600 individuals who were the ancestors of humankind.

Mossel Bay is a harbour town of about 130,000 people, on the Southern Cape of South Africa. During routine archaeological surveys to develop the Pinnacle Point Beach and Golf resort, a series of caves cut into the sea-facing cliffs were discovered.

The Mossel Archaeological Project was formed, led by Curtis Marean ( a paleaeoanthropologist). They began excavations in the year 2000 and discovered that the caves were occupied between 170,000 and 40,000 years ago by Middle Stone Age people.

David Reed et al thus claimed that clothes first appeared in Africa as early as 170.000 years ago – roughly with the rapid onset of an ice age.

P.S. This article is an upshot on the one in my Book: “The Origin of The Meiteis of Manipur & Meiteilon is not a Tibeto-Burman language (2009 p88)

The write is based in the UK
Email: imsingh(at)onetel.com
Website: www.drimsingh.co.uk

Published: March 9, 2012

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/03/when-did-humans-begin-to-wear-clothes/

A new human cousin discovered

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh While God has been elusive for eternity, refusing to unfold… more »

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh

Dr. Irengbam Mohendra Singh

While God has been elusive for eternity, refusing to unfold his mysteries, if we look back in time we will find that we have begun to unravel the mysteries of nature with vast changes in our intellectual achievements, such as Gödel’s theorem, molecular biology and Wittgenstein’s antiphilosophy.

In the midst of all these, archaeologists and geneticists were flabbergasted at the discovery of a new human cousin. Professor Chris Stringer, human origins researcher at London’s Natural History Museum, one of the leading proponents of the recent single (African) origin hypothesis, remarked that: “This new DNA work provides an entirely new way of looking at the evolution of humans in central and eastern Asia.”

The plot is thickening about the origin of early humans who inhabited this planet of ours. There may have been seven distinct types of human ancestor from Africa who expanded to remote islands of Indonesia, Europe and Siberia.

Every one of them became extinct like the dinosaurs between thousands of years to millennia except us. It may have been because of the ingenuity, intelligence and adaptability of the Homo sapiens species that we are here today. Our brain has now reached maturity and it will not expand any more. And we are here to stay.

The surprise story began in March 2010 when scientists, led by Johannes Krause and fellow researcher, Swedish biologist Svante Paabo from Mark Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Eastern Germany, published online in the “Nature”, the finding of the DNA from a girl’s old finger bone.

The bit of bone but a huge bone for evolutionists was found in 2008 by Russian archaeologists from the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of Novosibirsk, working at the site of Denisova cave, in the Altai Krai Mountains of southern Siberia. They sent it to Leipzig for identification

A finger bone fragment from the fifth finger of a juvenile female that lived 40,000 years ago, as well as a fragment of a molar tooth, much bigger than human molar was discovered. The finger bone was found within 65 miles of known Neanderthal and modern human sites. Later in 2011, a toe bone was also unravelled (it is currently undergoing analysis).

The finger bone’s mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis showed it to be distinct from the mtDNAs of Neanderthals and modern humans. Subsequent studies on the nuclear genome from this specimen, as well as mtDNA from the tooth, determined that this group shares a common origin with Neanderthals and interbred with the ancestors of some present day Melanesians (people from the islands of Papa New Guinea) and Australian aborigines.

This juvenile hominin is now dubbed the “X-woman” (referring to the maternal descent of mtDNA), or the “Denisova hominin”. Some artefacts, including a bracelet, excavated in the cave at the same level were carbon dated to around 40,000 BP.

Prof Paabo noted that the existence of these distant branch humans creates much more complex picture of human kind during the late Pleistocene epoch. Denisova Cave is known to have also been inhabited by Neanderthal people and perhaps by modern humans. Because of the cool climate in this location, the discovery benefited from DNA’s ability to survive for longer periods at lower temperatures of the cave at 32 degrees Fahrenheight.

The analysis indicated that modern humans, Neanderthals and the Denisova hominin last shared a common ancestor around 1 million years ago. Denisovans are found to be a sister group to Neanderthals and had similar ancestors, because all non-African humans have Neanderthal DNA.

According to researchers, this provides confirmation that there were at least four distinct types of humans in existence (including Homo erectus) when anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens) first left their African homeland.

The fact that Denisovans were discovered in southern Siberia, but contributed genetic material to modern human populations in Southeast Asia suggests that their population may have been widespread in Asia during the Pleistocene age.

The DNA analysis further indicated that these new Denisovans were the result of an earlier migration out of Africa, distinct from the later out-of-Africa migrations associated with Neanderthals and modern humans, but also distinct from the earlier migration of Homo erectus, who were to colonise Asia.

According to the co-author in the “Nature”, Richard Green of the University of California, Santa Cruz, there was probably an ancestral group that left Africa between 300,000 and 400.000 years ago and quickly diverged, with one branch becoming the Neanderthals who spread into Europe and the other branch moving east and becoming Denisovans.

When modern humans left Africa 60,000 years ago, they first encountered the Neanderthals, an interaction prevailed that left traces of Neanderthal DNA scattered throughout the genomes of all non-Africans. The other group of humans later came in contact with Denisovans leaving traces of Denisovan DNA in the genomes who settled in Melanesi – an assemblage of islands of Australia’s coast including New Guinea.

Richard Green says, “It was fruitous that this discovery came quickly on the heels of the Neanderthal genome, because we already had the team ready to do a similar analysis.” He said Denisovans were quite different from Neanderthals and modern humans. They had teeth similar to those of older human ancestors, such as Homo erectus.

The Leipzig scientist Kraus said that since the discovery was announced in March 2010, the researchers have been focussed on the task of decoding the entire 3 billion DNA building blocks in the complete genetic make-up of the newcomer from the Atlai Mountains.

The Leipzig scientists have also reported the isolation and sequencing of nuclear DNA from the Denisovan finger bone in 2010. The specimen showed an unusual preservation of DNA and low level of contamination, allowing them a detailed comparison of its genome with Neanderthal and modern humans.

They concluded that the Denisovan population along with Neanderthal shared a common branch from the lineage leading to modern African humans.. The estimated average time of divergence between Denisovans and Neanderthals sequences is 640,000 years ago, and between both of these and the sequences of modern Africans is 804,000 years ago.

Modern genetic studies show that app. 4% of non-African modern human DNA relates to Neanderthals. A new comparison of Denisovan genome from six modern humans, one each from South Africa, Nigeria, France, Hans Chinese, Papua New Guinea and Bougainville islands showed that between 4% and 6% of the genome of the Melanesians derive from Denisovan population.

The scientists suggest that the genes were probably introduced during the early migration of the ancestors of Melanesians into Southeast Asia, where Denisovans once ranged widely over eastern Asia.

Mark Stoneking, molecular anthropologist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary anthropology, Leipzig, (most famous for his estimation that human clothing originated about 72,000 years ago, by sequencing the genes of head and body lice in 2007) led a research team, which found genetic evidence that, in addition to Melanesians, Australian aborigines, and small, scattered groups of people in Southeast Asia, such as Negrito of Mamanawa in the Phillipines shares Denisovan ancestry, though Andaman Islander Negritos and Malaysian Jehai, do not.

With their result, they challenged the belief that Denisovans interbred in mainland Asia before spreading to the island from Southeast Asia, Melanesia, and Australia.

Recent genetic studies in 2011 have indicated that modern humans may have mated with “at least two groups” of ancient humans: Neanderthals and Denisovans.

Ian Tatersall of the Department of Physical Anthropology at the American Museum of National History says that “We are the only hominid around today, and we tend to think that that’s how it’s always been. But the evidence is accumulating that the human evolutionary tree is quite luxuriantly branching.

Scientists have no idea what the Denisovan hominis look like. Paabo says that because the Denisova homini is assumed to be human, it’s possible that there are many unknown homini fossils waiting to be discovered. Palaeontologists will continue to scour for remnants in Siberia.

Apart from Denisovans, scientists discovered a new very strange humanlike species (published in “Nature” in 2004) that lived over the past few hundred years in the east of the last islands of Java in Indonesia – a scattered remote archipelago. The remains of this new species had been excavated in 2004, in Liang Bua Cave on the island of Flores, and hence named Homo floresiensis (aka the Hobbit). The creature was only one meter tall and very small-brained.

Homo floresiensis was considered intelligent as the cave contained evidence of tool making, butchery of animal carcasses, and fire. They survived until about 17,000 years ago. The latest studies of the Hobbit bones have led to the radical idea that these tiny people in fact, descended from something more primitive than Homo erectus – yet another species whose ancestors emerged from Africa 2 million years ago, or more, and then evolved in isolation in Southeast Asia, finally disappearing within the last 20 millennia.

There is no knowledge of when the Neanderthals ad Homo erectus disappeared, overwhelmed by Homo sapiens, probably because of better tools and other resources.

What stumps the scientists by the finding this strange humanlike creatures is that Africa could have been home to yet another species of humans within the last 50,000 years, based on signs of possible ancestral DNA in modern African populations and fossils found in Nigeria and Congo.

The writer is based in the UK
Email: imsingh(at)onetel.com
Website: www.drimsingh.co.uk

Published: March 6, 2012

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2012/03/a-new-human-cousin-discovered/